MCP Comparison · 2026
Activepieces (MCP archived) vs Make (Integromat) MCP Server
Comparing Activepieces (MCP archived) and Make (Integromat) as MCP servers? Activepieces (MCP archived) (run activepieces flows) is best when triggering existing activepieces flows. Make (Integromat) (run make scenarios) is best when triggering existing make scenarios. Both run as Model Context Protocol servers and can coexist in the same client. Updated 2026.
Side-by-side specs
Pulled from each MCP's verified fact sheet.
| Activepieces (MCP archived) | Make (Integromat) | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary function | Run Activepieces flows | Run Make scenarios |
| Maintainer | Community | Community (unofficial Make.com MCP) |
| Pricing | Open source | Freemium |
| Setup complexity | Low · ~8 min | Low · ~7 min |
| Transport | stdio | stdio |
| Auth model | API key | API key |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Latest version | latest | latest |
| Compatible clients | Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Any MCP-compatible client, Activepieces 0.20+ | Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Any MCP-compatible client, Make Cloud (any region) |
| Last verified | 2026-05-31 | 2026-05-31 |
Which one should you pick?
Decision rubric drawn from each MCP's documented strengths.
Choose Activepieces (MCP archived)
- Triggering existing Activepieces flows
- Run inspection
- Self-hosted automation workflows
Choose Make (Integromat)
- Triggering existing Make scenarios
- Inspecting failed runs
- Listing scenarios available to the agent
Pick something else if…
- Flow authoring (use the Activepieces UI)
- Authoring scenarios (use the Make visual builder)
Feature breakdown
Key capabilities each server ships out of the box.
Activepieces (MCP archived)
- Self-hosted + cloud support
- API-key auth
- Flow enumeration + trigger
- Run-history inspection
- AI-native pieces visible to the agent
Make (Integromat)
- Make Cloud + EU + US regions
- API-token auth scoped to one org
- Scenario enumeration
- On-demand execution
- Run-log inspection
Install snippets
Open the detail page for ready-to-paste config for every major client.
FAQ
Activepieces (MCP archived) vs Make (Integromat): which MCP server should I use?
Pick Activepieces (MCP archived) when triggering existing activepieces flows. Pick Make (Integromat) when triggering existing make scenarios. Activepieces (MCP archived) is built for run activepieces flows, while Make (Integromat) focuses on run make scenarios.
Can I run both Activepieces (MCP archived) and Make (Integromat) together?
Yes. MCP clients run each server as a separate process and surface every server's tools simultaneously, so you can install both and let your agent decide which to call. Be deliberate with auth scopes when stacking servers.
How fresh is this comparison?
Updated for 2026. Activepieces (MCP archived)'s last verification: 2026-05-31. Make (Integromat)'s last verification: 2026-05-31. We refresh detail-page facts on every catalog rebuild.
More Activepieces (MCP archived) comparisons
Browse all Automation & Workflows MCPs? See the full ranked list →