MCP Comparison · 2026
Attio vs Close MCP Server
Comparing Attio and Close as MCP servers? Attio (manage crm records) is best when natural-language crm management. Close (operate close crm) is best when reading and updating close leads + opportunities. Both run as Model Context Protocol servers and can coexist in the same client. Updated 2026.
Side-by-side specs
Pulled from each MCP's verified fact sheet.
| Attio | Close | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary function | Manage CRM Records | Operate Close CRM |
| Maintainer | Attio | Close |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Setup complexity | Low · ~< 1 min | Low · ~5 min |
| Transport | Streamable HTTP | Streamable HTTP |
| Auth model | OAuth 2.1 | OAuth 2.1 |
| License | Proprietary | — |
| Language | — | — |
| Latest version | — | latest |
| Compatible clients | Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT, Raycast, Any MCP-compatible client | Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT, n8n, Any MCP-compatible client |
| Last verified | 2026-06-11 | 2026-07-16 |
Which one should you pick?
Decision rubric drawn from each MCP's documented strengths.
Choose Attio
- Natural-language CRM management
- Pipeline updates from an agent
- Note-taking against people and companies
Choose Close
- Reading and updating Close leads + opportunities
- Scoped access (read / write-safe / destructive)
- Task and follow-up creation
Pick something else if…
- Teams not on Attio
- Non-Close CRM stacks
Feature breakdown
Key capabilities each server ships out of the box.
Attio
- Official remote MCP at `https://mcp.attio.com/mcp`
- One-click OAuth — listed in Claude, ChatGPT, and Raycast directories
- Full workspace access: records, lists, notes, attributes
- Natural-language record search and update
- Hosted by Attio — no self-hosting
Close
- Official remote MCP at mcp.close.com/mcp
- Three scopes: read, write_safe, write_destructive
- Leads, contacts, opportunities, tasks
- OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration
- HTTP streamable transport
Install snippets
Open the detail page for ready-to-paste config for every major client.
FAQ
Attio vs Close: which MCP server should I use?
Pick Attio when natural-language crm management. Pick Close when reading and updating close leads + opportunities. Attio is built for manage crm records, while Close focuses on operate close crm.
Can I run both Attio and Close together?
Yes. MCP clients run each server as a separate process and surface every server's tools simultaneously, so you can install both and let your agent decide which to call. Be deliberate with auth scopes when stacking servers.
How fresh is this comparison?
Updated for 2026. Attio's last verification: 2026-06-11. Close's last verification: 2026-07-16. We refresh detail-page facts on every catalog rebuild.
More Attio comparisons
Browse all CRM MCPs? See the full ranked list →