topmcps
Browse MCPs

MCP Comparison · 2026

AWS vs Grafana MCP Server

Comparing AWS and Grafana as MCP servers? AWS (inspect aws) is best when incident investigation. Grafana (query grafana dashboards) is best when incident investigation across metrics + logs. Both run as Model Context Protocol servers and can coexist in the same client. Updated 2026.

AWS

AWS

AWS's own managed MCP server — run AWS APIs, execute sandboxed scripts, and search AWS documentation under IAM.

Grafana

Grafana

Query dashboards, Prometheus/Loki datasources, alerts, and incidents from an AI agent — official.

Side-by-side specs

Pulled from each MCP's verified fact sheet.

 AWSGrafana
Primary functionInspect AWSQuery Grafana dashboards
MaintainerAWSGrafana Labs
PricingFreemiumFreemium
Setup complexityMedium · ~10 minMedium · ~5 min
TransportStreamable HTTPstdio, SSE, Streamable HTTP
Auth modelOAuth 2.1API key
LicenseProprietaryApache-2.0
Language—Go
Latest versionremotelatest
Compatible clientsClaude, Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Kiro, Gemini CLI, Any remote-MCP client with OAuthClaude, Cursor, VS Code, Any MCP-compatible client, Grafana 9.0+
Last verified2026-09-052026-10-01

Which one should you pick?

Decision rubric drawn from each MCP's documented strengths.

Choose AWS

  • Incident investigation
  • IAM and security audits
  • Multi-step resource queries in one script call
See full AWS write-up →

Choose Grafana

  • Incident investigation across metrics + logs
  • Querying Prometheus and Loki via one MCP
  • Dashboard search and editing
See full Grafana write-up →

Pick something else if…

  • Provisioning new infrastructure
  • Grafana versions before 9.0

Feature breakdown

Key capabilities each server ships out of the box.

AWS

  • Managed by AWS — nothing to run locally on the OAuth path
  • Two Regions: us-east-1 and eu-central-1
  • aws___run_script executes sandboxed Python across many AWS calls in one invocation
  • IAM authorisation with CloudTrail audit and CloudWatch agent-activity metrics
  • OAuth 2.1 for web/desktop clients, SigV4 via mcp-proxy-for-aws-cli for terminal agents

Grafana

  • Dashboards + 12 datasource types (Prometheus, Loki, ClickHouse, CloudWatch…)
  • Alerting, Incident, OnCall, Sift tools
  • stdio, SSE, and streamable-http transports
  • Service-account token auth
  • Official Grafana Labs, Apache-2.0, Go

Install snippets

Open the detail page for ready-to-paste config for every major client.

Install AWS

Setup snippets for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf →

claude mcp add aws-mcp https://aws-mcp.us-east-1.api.aws/mcp --transport http

Install Grafana

Setup snippets for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf →

docker run --rm -i -e GRAFANA_URL -e GRAFANA_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_TOKEN grafana/mcp-grafana -t stdio

FAQ

AWS vs Grafana: which MCP server should I use?

Pick AWS when incident investigation. Pick Grafana when incident investigation across metrics + logs. AWS is built for inspect aws, while Grafana focuses on query grafana dashboards.

Can I run both AWS and Grafana together?

Yes. MCP clients run each server as a separate process and surface every server's tools simultaneously, so you can install both and let your agent decide which to call. Be deliberate with auth scopes when stacking servers.

How fresh is this comparison?

Updated for 2026. AWS's last verification: 2026-09-05. Grafana's last verification: 2026-10-01. We refresh detail-page facts on every catalog rebuild.

More AWS comparisons

AWSvsGoogle MCP ToolboxAWSvsCloudflareAWSvsDigitalOceanAWSvsVercel (MCP server)

Browse all Cloud & Infrastructure MCPs? See the full ranked list →