MCP Comparison · 2026
Hostinger vs Porkbun MCP Server
Comparing Hostinger and Porkbun as MCP servers? Hostinger (manage hostinger domains and hosting) is best when end-to-end domain → dns → deploy in one server. Porkbun (manage porkbun domains and dns) is best when read-only dns inspection with no risk of a write. Both run as Model Context Protocol servers and can coexist in the same client. Updated 2026.
Side-by-side specs
Pulled from each MCP's verified fact sheet.
| Hostinger | Porkbun | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary function | Manage Hostinger Domains and Hosting | Manage Porkbun Domains and DNS |
| Maintainer | Hostinger | Community (korobkov-v) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Open source |
| Setup complexity | Medium · ~10 min | Low · ~5 min |
| Transport | stdio, Streamable HTTP | stdio |
| Auth model | OAuth 2.1 | API key |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Latest version | latest | latest |
| Compatible clients | Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Any MCP-compatible client, Hostinger accounts | Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Any MCP-compatible client, Porkbun accounts |
| Last verified | 2026-09-29 | 2026-09-17 |
Which one should you pick?
Decision rubric drawn from each MCP's documented strengths.
Choose Hostinger
- End-to-end domain → DNS → deploy in one server
- AI-assisted domain name suggestions from a project description
- DNS zone snapshots and point-in-time restore
Choose Porkbun
- Read-only DNS inspection with no risk of a write
- Declarative DNS (`dns_batch_apply`, `dns_upsert`)
- At-cost registration behind a double opt-in
Pick something else if…
- Accounts held at another registrar or host
- Workflows requiring official vendor support
Feature breakdown
Key capabilities each server ships out of the box.
Hostinger
- Three tools — `search`, `execute`, `multi-execute` — over 403 API operations (v2.4.0, probed 2026-09-29)
- Per-product entry points so you can install one slice
- OAuth 2.0 + PKCE by default; `HOSTINGER_API_TOKEN` bypasses it for CI
- stdio and HTTP transports (`--http`)
- MIT, released almost daily
Porkbun
- 40 tools verified by probe on v0.3
- Read-only by default; writes need `--get-muddy`
- Registration needs a second flag, `--enable-domain-create`
- Scenario tools default to `dry_run: true`
- MIT, npx-first, Node >= 20
Install snippets
Open the detail page for ready-to-paste config for every major client.
FAQ
Hostinger vs Porkbun: which MCP server should I use?
Pick Hostinger when end-to-end domain → dns → deploy in one server. Pick Porkbun when read-only dns inspection with no risk of a write. Hostinger is built for manage hostinger domains and hosting, while Porkbun focuses on manage porkbun domains and dns.
Can I run both Hostinger and Porkbun together?
Yes. MCP clients run each server as a separate process and surface every server's tools simultaneously, so you can install both and let your agent decide which to call. Be deliberate with auth scopes when stacking servers.
Which is easier to set up, Hostinger or Porkbun?
Porkbun has the lighter setup. Hostinger reports medium complexity (~10 min); Porkbun reports low complexity (~5 min).
More Hostinger comparisons
Browse all Domains MCPs? See the full ranked list →