MCP Comparison · 2026
Make (Integromat) vs Zapier MCP Server
Comparing Make (Integromat) and Zapier as MCP servers? Make (Integromat) (run make scenarios) is best when triggering existing make scenarios. Zapier (automate cross-app workflows) is best when long-tail app integrations. Both run as Model Context Protocol servers and can coexist in the same client. Updated 2026.
Side-by-side specs
Pulled from each MCP's verified fact sheet.
| Make (Integromat) | Zapier | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary function | Run Make scenarios | Automate Cross-App Workflows |
| Maintainer | Community (unofficial Make.com MCP) | Zapier |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Setup complexity | Low · ~7 min | Low · ~5 min |
| Transport | stdio | Streamable HTTP |
| Auth model | API key | API key |
| License | MIT | Proprietary |
| Language | TypeScript | Hosted |
| Latest version | latest | latest |
| Compatible clients | Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Any MCP-compatible client, Make Cloud (any region) | Claude, Cursor, Any MCP-compatible client |
| Last verified | 2026-05-31 | 2026-05-31 |
Which one should you pick?
Decision rubric drawn from each MCP's documented strengths.
Choose Make (Integromat)
- Triggering existing Make scenarios
- Inspecting failed runs
- Listing scenarios available to the agent
Choose Zapier
- Long-tail app integrations
- Prototyping new workflows
- Cross-app automations
Pick something else if…
- Authoring scenarios (use the Make visual builder)
- Latency-sensitive automation
Feature breakdown
Key capabilities each server ships out of the box.
Make (Integromat)
- Make Cloud + EU + US regions
- API-token auth scoped to one org
- Scenario enumeration
- On-demand execution
- Run-log inspection
Zapier
- 8,000+ app integrations
- Per-Zap tool exposure
- Usage-based pricing on Zapier side
- Official maintenance
- Single auth surface
Install snippets
Open the detail page for ready-to-paste config for every major client.
FAQ
Make (Integromat) vs Zapier: which MCP server should I use?
Pick Make (Integromat) when triggering existing make scenarios. Pick Zapier when long-tail app integrations. Make (Integromat) is built for run make scenarios, while Zapier focuses on automate cross-app workflows.
Can I run both Make (Integromat) and Zapier together?
Yes. MCP clients run each server as a separate process and surface every server's tools simultaneously, so you can install both and let your agent decide which to call. Be deliberate with auth scopes when stacking servers.
How fresh is this comparison?
Updated for 2026. Make (Integromat)'s last verification: 2026-05-31. Zapier's last verification: 2026-05-31. We refresh detail-page facts on every catalog rebuild.
More Make (Integromat) comparisons
Browse all Automation & Workflows MCPs? See the full ranked list →