- Home
- Top MCPs for Analytics & Data
- Grafana vs PostgreSQL (archived)
MCP Comparison · 2026
Grafana vs PostgreSQL (archived) MCP Server
Comparing Grafana and PostgreSQL (archived) as MCP servers? Grafana (query grafana dashboards) is best when incident investigation across metrics + logs. PostgreSQL (archived) (query postgres) is best when auditing or replacing an existing install. Both run as Model Context Protocol servers and can coexist in the same client. Updated 2026.
Side-by-side specs
Pulled from each MCP's verified fact sheet.
| Grafana | PostgreSQL (archived) | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary function | Query Grafana dashboards | Query Postgres |
| Maintainer | Grafana Labs | Anthropic (archived 2025-07-10) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Open source |
| Setup complexity | Medium · ~5 min | Low · ~3 min |
| Transport | stdio, SSE, Streamable HTTP | stdio |
| Auth model | API key | API key |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Latest version | latest | archived |
| Compatible clients | Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Any MCP-compatible client, Grafana 9.0+ | Claude, Cursor, Any MCP-compatible client, PostgreSQL 12+ |
| Last verified | 2026-07-16 | 2026-05-29 |
Which one should you pick?
Decision rubric drawn from each MCP's documented strengths.
Choose Grafana
- Incident investigation across metrics + logs
- Querying Prometheus and Loki via one MCP
- Dashboard search and editing
Choose PostgreSQL (archived)
- Auditing or replacing an existing install
- Reference reading for how the early MCP servers were structured
Pick something else if…
- Grafana versions before 9.0
- New installs (the repo is archived)
Feature breakdown
Key capabilities each server ships out of the box.
Grafana
- Dashboards + 12 datasource types (Prometheus, Loki, ClickHouse, CloudWatch…)
- Alerting, Incident, OnCall, Sift tools
- stdio, SSE, and streamable-http transports
- Service-account token auth
- Official Grafana Labs, Apache-2.0, Go
PostgreSQL (archived)
- Archived on 2025-07-10 — no upstream maintenance
- Read-only contract is bypassable per Datadog Security Labs
- SELECT-only tool surface (when the contract holds)
- Stdio transport; one connection per process
- Recommended migration: Postgres MCP Pro or Supabase MCP
Install snippets
Open the detail page for ready-to-paste config for every major client.
Install Grafana
Setup snippets for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf →
docker run --rm -i -e GRAFANA_URL -e GRAFANA_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_TOKEN grafana/mcp-grafana -t stdioInstall PostgreSQL (archived)
Setup snippets for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf →
npx -y @modelcontextprotocol/server-postgres postgresql://user:pass@localhost/dbFAQ
Grafana vs PostgreSQL (archived): which MCP server should I use?
Pick Grafana when incident investigation across metrics + logs. Pick PostgreSQL (archived) when auditing or replacing an existing install. Grafana is built for query grafana dashboards, while PostgreSQL (archived) focuses on query postgres.
Can I run both Grafana and PostgreSQL (archived) together?
Yes. MCP clients run each server as a separate process and surface every server's tools simultaneously, so you can install both and let your agent decide which to call. Be deliberate with auth scopes when stacking servers.
Which is easier to set up, Grafana or PostgreSQL (archived)?
PostgreSQL (archived) has the lighter setup. Grafana reports medium complexity (~5 min); PostgreSQL (archived) reports low complexity (~3 min).
More Grafana comparisons
Browse all Analytics & Data MCPs? See the full ranked list →